Anatexis
Partial melting of pre-existing rocks, especially deep-crustal metamorphic rocks, which may generate melt-bearing migmatites and granitoid magmas.
Language and route: Scientific geological borrowing from Greek ἀνάτηξις (aná-tēxis), remelting, from ἀνά (aná) again/up + τῆξις (têxis) melting. Scientific geological borrowing from Greek ἀνάτηξις (aná-tēxis), remelting, from ἀνά (aná) again/up + τῆξις (têxis) melting
Literal gloss: melting again
The name and its history
First individual geological coiner not established · Original naming act not securely page-verified
- What does the word literally mean?
- Immediate linguistic route: Scientific geological borrowing from Greek ἀνάτηξις (aná-tēxis), remelting, from ἀνά (aná) again/up + τῆξις (têxis) melting. Literal or inherited gloss: ‘melting again’. An attested linguistic component is not by itself evidence of a historical scientist’s reason for naming this rock.
- What did the original author mean?
- Sederholm’s early-twentieth-century Finnish basement investigations helped circulate the term in discussions of mixed rocks, palingenesis and granite formation.
- Why was the name needed?
- Researchers needed a process term to distinguish renewed melting of older rocks from simple solid-state recrystallisation and externally sourced granite injection.
- What evidence supported the original concept?
- Field leucosomes, melt-like segregations and mineral reaction relations motivated the hypothesis; modern experimental petrology and phase equilibria test melting more rigorously.
- How has geology changed the concept?
- Anatexis is now a process inferred from combined evidence; not every banded migmatite unequivocally documents melting, nor is all granite necessarily crustal anatectic melt.
Further historical context
Sederholm’s early-twentieth-century Finnish basement investigations helped circulate the term in discussions of mixed rocks, palingenesis and granite formation.
Researchers needed a process term to distinguish renewed melting of older rocks from simple solid-state recrystallisation and externally sourced granite injection.
Field leucosomes, melt-like segregations and mineral reaction relations motivated the hypothesis; modern experimental petrology and phase equilibria test melting more rigorously.
Anatexis is now a process inferred from combined evidence; not every banded migmatite unequivocally documents melting, nor is all granite necessarily crustal anatectic melt.
Editorial qualification
Do not equate an early recorded description with a formal first coining; exact priority and historical wording remain unverified.
Related names
Migmatite · Leucosome · Melanosome · Granite · Gneiss
Sources
- Eklund et al. (2010), Jakob Johannes Sederholm, Lithos — scholarly retrospective identifies 1907 Om granit och gneiss and Greek meaning; original not directly transcribed
- IUGS SCMR, Migmatites, Wimmenauer and Bryhni (translation and link to original) — modern complexity and non-strict limits in migmatite nomenclature
- 1986 migmatites research: 1907 Sederholm terminology and disputes — later discussion of Sederholm 1907 and partial melting